The
first time mental illness is diagnosed in a member of the family by the mental
health team, it is usually a major life event laden with devastating
emotional experience for the patient
and even the family members. Mental illness unlike others invariably get
reported by the family members unlike in
other diseases where certain signs and
symptoms may readily lead the patient to seek medical attention clarified through history taking, clinical examinations and investigations . Mental illness occurs
when an individual comes up with a pattern of behavior that is causing distress
to such an individual as observed by the close relatives who may organize some
form of attention but in our worldview when it comes to mental illness,
orthodox medical practitioners are not of immediate consideration. Although the
patient may explain the distressful behavior away as normal but the obvious
distress is not only noticeable but constitutes a very devastating experience
for the patient enough to impair his or her basic responsibility to self,
immediate members of his family and the society at large. Most times, at the onset
the relatives no matter how educated some could be, may support the patient to
sustain the denial. At this point, close relatives may collaborate with the
patient to put forward cultural and religious explanations for the distressful behavior,
which invariably undermines the help- seeking strategy in the direction of the
orthodox medical intervention. Majority of the first episodes of mental illness
do not get to the hospital since the alternative practitioners are usually the
immediate contact of intervention even for the educated ones. The patient can
only receive proper orthodox intervention
as promptly as the significant others
can snap out of the denial,
accept the symptoms as due to mental illness
and come up with empirical strategies of intervention. Our cultural
software overrides our empirical understanding of the illness and leads us into
many other places before we snap out of the cultural hypnotism to seek orthodox
medical intervention.
I
think the denial that leads us in the waiting hands of culture and religion is
traceable to the painful, not easily admissible experience of having a loved
one come down with mental illness. Mental illness alters and dislocates the
behavioral pattern of the patient that relatives have been acquainted with over
time. It is a nightmare to discover that
someone you have had a wonderful relationship with over time is now estranged
and can no longer interact intelligently again. It deals a painful blow to the
overall experience of companionship with that individual. This becomes more
traumatic when the illness is directed against the loved ones through persecutory ideas and delusion. It is not a
pleasant experience for a mentally ill husband to accuse a faithful, committed
wife of infidelity in a very graphic and extremely persistent manner although
without a rational basis that may require a professional clinical experience to
identify. A good number of our untrained, religious marriage counselors may
have been misled by delusions from mental illnesses in a marital conflict. Unfortunately,
our culture feeds our religion with paranoia that invariably spill into our
daily life experiences. Some wonderful and extended family relationships have
been destroyed on this premise. Beyond the personal painful experience is the
shame that the stigma of having a loved one with mental illness confers. Deriving
from the sick role, there are certain embarrassing sanctions and discriminations
that the family, apart from the patient, experiences. There are implication for
marital and occupational opportunities where the discovery of history of mental
illness may halt a marriage plan in our African culture. Other leadership
conferment may also be jeopardized as a result.
All
these reasons and many others affect the type of intervention that relatives
organize for the first episode of mental illness in Africa. Relatives and other
stakeholders in the care of the mentally ill wriggle through strong cultural
software that distracts from seeking orthodox help early enough and promptly.
Mental health advocacy should be directed towards this tendency of misdirecting
the first episode of mental illness into the wrong hands. The earlier the
orthodox medical intervention; the better is the outcome for such patient.
Great populations of our mentally ill patients are locked up in spiritual homes
and herbalist dens in sometimes dehumanizing conditions. When there is no
prompt intervention; symptoms of mental illness impact adversely on the personality
leading to a poor sense of self, loss of
motivation and extreme withdrawal from
social interactions such that such the individual becomes a ghost of his or her
past which should not have been so if
prompt and orthodox intervention has
been promptly instituted at the first
episode.
Dr. Adeoye Oyewole
adeoyewole2000@yahoo.com
+234 803 490 5808 (WhatsApp only)
Comments
Post a Comment